Situational Leadership® and Situational Leadership II®

Originally theorized by Hersey and Blanchard, and now modified by both after further research. Both models deal with leadership styles, where determining your style helps determine the appropriate behavior to show in any given situation. One relies on accurately determining the level of individual or group maturation level. The other outlines level of competence and commitment, with the levels of development, to determine the appropriate behavior. Both theories map into the PF quadrant, but are inadequate in dealing with individuals whose profile falls outside that area.

Introducing a SYMLOG analysis would allow you to more accurately understand your “situation”, and how to proceed with leading subordinates. Making ratings on co-workers would show the actual level of maturity or development you perceive them to have, and also further strengthen your ability to behave effectively with their individual needs.

Adding SYMLOG ratings from all members of the team would allow you as a group to examine your perceptions of each other, how effectively you believe you are able to work together, and what each of you needs to do, individually and collectively, to become more productive and effective.