Skip to main content

SYMLOG vs.

Belbin

Team inventories

Summary of SYMLOG and Belbin

Measures individual behavior in a team environment, and classifies the behavior into nine team roles (originally eight with Specialist added after initial studies). Individuals have tendencies toward multiple roles, and Belbin states these are team roles, not personality types. Groups need these roles, and the activities performed in each, in order to maximize problem-solving. A balance should be present among members. The roles themselves, however, have the potential not only for polarization, but also neglect the social-emotional needs of a team in order to maximize its effectiveness.

A SYMLOG analysis would further provide feedback to individuals and the team on how effective the behaviors shown actually are, and what changes or additions to the team’s natural inclinations are required to be more effective.

SYMLOG and Belbin

The authors coded the Belbin items into the SYMLOG dimensions. The results revealed that the questionnaire used by Belbin to determine one’s team role preference focus mainly on task-oriented and influence-seeking behavior. Social-emotional behavior is only represented by 10 of the 70 possible items in the Belbin questionnaire.

"Neither fundamental opposition or destructive behavior nor empathy, making jokes, releasing tension are mentioned. Even negative aspects of team work are characterized by strongly task-oriented behavior" (accepting of authority, rules, regulations, inflexibility, and authoritarian behavior perceived as negative by others)…"Social-emotional aspects seem to be of secondary importance."p.27

Positions of the nine team roles within the SYMLOG space model

Note in the field diagram representing the results of the study, eight of the roles are located in the Forward part of the SYMLOG space, either Positive-Forward (P-F), Negative-Forward (N-F), or merely Forward (F) as is the case with the Resource Investigator. Only the Plant is in the Backward (B) part of the space which represents values on opposing authority, and encompasses both rebellious and nurturing, training, empathic behavior—all necessary for effective social interaction. “…the location of the team roles within the SYMLOG space shows some bias of the team roles neglecting to some extent the interpersonal dimension and nonconformistic (sic) and emotionally determined behavioral values.” p. 30.

“The team role approach and SYMLOG present instruments to identify differences between group members with respect to team role preferences and behavioral values. The factor analysis of the team role self-perceptions, and the location of the team roles within the SYMLOG space model, suggest potential lines of polarization of team role diversity which have to be overcome for the realization of effective group work: Polarization may arise from different degrees of personal orientation, differences between ‘worker’-roles and ‘leader’-roles, differences between the roles ‘special and ‘generalist’ and from differences in managing change and innovation. These results indicate different aspects where tolerance for diversity has to be focused.”pp. 32-33.
Beck and Fisch research, 2005

Beck and Fisch research, 2005

The team member roles show individual preferences. The choice alone of a role shows the potential for polarization within the group, but not the value-orientation of the members. Using SYMLOG in conjunction with the Belbin team roles can help clarify the interpersonal conflicts and diversities within the group, and thus address and formulate strategies to mediate these differences effectively.

Ready to use any of our professional methods for improving performance?