Skip to main content

SYMLOG vs.

DiSC®

Leadership style and quadrant model

Overview of DiSC®

The DiSC®, and any related instrument to it (e.g., DISC®-360), appears to be widely used and well respected. It was developed from the original work of the psychologist William Marston. It is a quadrant behavioral model, and was originally correlated with the personality factors in Cattell’s 16 PF (personality factors). SYMLOG also correlates with numerous scales found in the factors of Cattell, the MMPI, Thurstone, and Couch.

The DiSC® groups characteristics of behavior into four major styles. The four styles are:

D = Dominance/Drive
I = Influence/Inducement
S = Steadiness/Submission
C = Conscientiousness/Compliance

The D and I have aspects of extroversion, in the classical psychological use.
The S and C are classical attributes of introversion.
These can be seen as part of the U-D dimension in SYMLOG, but the words used between the two factors are neither opposite nor bi-polar, as in SYMLOG.

The D and C represent task-focused aspects of the personality (F-B dimension).
The I and S represent social aspects of the personality (P-N dimension).
This seems not unlike the many studies that look at concern for task/production vs. concern for people, or Theory X vs. Theory Y, that have been used since the early years of the discipline. Generally, these all measure in the SYMLOG PF quadrant, and represent the classic polarization between F and P in SYMLOG.

This four-quadrant model is essentially another example of classical four quadrant models that describe and label, but lack a measurement system, or underlying theoretical basis (field theory in the case of SYMLOG).

Heuristic Comparison of DiSC® to SYMLOG®

Copyright © SYMLOG Consulting Group, 2015

DiSC®

Word association
with ranking system

Assessment of self

Assessment of self and report
from others (DiSC 360)

One image only – self
4 behaviorally-based factors

Based on adjectives

Results reported by quadrant

Based on behavioral styles

Personality model

15 unique styles named as classical profile patterns of behavior

High, medium, and low in each dimension, based on responses

28 adjectives/traits used for calculating strength in each of 4 categories, - integrated into 1 of 15 classical patterns or “styles”

Descriptive results only

Infers relationship to work environment

Reports only behavior, not the impact on others

Additive model of factors

Factors are uni-dimensional

SYMLOG®

Measurement system with rating scale against a researched question

Assessment of self, others, concepts, team and organization

Assessment of self, others, concepts, team and organization, assessment from others

Multiple images – self, important concepts, other team members, team, culture, etc.

3 bi-polar dimensions

Based on adjectives, general behavior, or individual and organizational values

Results reported in field diagrams and bar graphs

Based on dimensions of social interaction – either behavior or values

Personality model and social interaction theory

26 personality and role types

Over, under, within range based on responses measured against a normative profile

26 items used to produce overall profile – dimensions both integrated and taken separately as 26 vectors

Descriptive and proscriptive (results compared with norm for effective)

Ability to ask directly on characteristics of work environment

Can measure impact of behavior on others through direct report

Dimensions are integrated

Dimensions are bi-polar

Ready to use any of our professional methods for improving performance?